perm filename EAF.TO[P,JRA] blob
sn#171772 filedate 1975-08-05 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 Hum!!!
C00005 ENDMK
Cā;
Hum!!!
I am not to thrilled with the way things are going with McGraw-Hill;
the words which first come to my mind to express how I feel about
this whole endeavor aren't printable. "appalling", "discourteous"
"unprofessional" are mild adjectives expressing how I feel I have
been treated in this mess. It was last December when you said that
McGraw-hill wanted the book. I have turned down another contract to
sign with McGraw; I have not looked elsewhere for another publisher
because of periodic assurance that everything was "ok". It is now two
months after I was informed that the contract was "soon to be
signed". I now get a letter saying that McGraw-Hill wants more
reviews to make "an accurate assessment of my proposal", and wants to
wait for the revised manuscript before doing so. What's been going
on for the last seven months?
Well two months ago I said that if the contract wasn't ready for me
by July 1, I'd go elsewhere. That's where things stand as far as I'm
concerned. When the revised version is finished it's up for any
publisher who wants it. If you want to send me a contract to sign
between now and then, o.k.; otherwise I'll inform you when the latest
version is ready. I find this whole mess absolutely incredible.
John Allen